Concert Review: HKPO - Bezhod Abduraimov - Ashkenazy

Concert Review: HKPO - Bezhod Abduraimov - Ashkenazy

July 1, 2016, CCCH
HKPO - Bezhod Abduraimov - Vladimir Ashkenazy
Prokofiev - Elgar


I was really looking forward to the return of both soloist and conductor, and I was not disappointed.

Behzod Abduraimov played a most enticing Rachmaninov 3rd last year, but this year's Prokofiev 3rd Piano Concerto was even more heaven storming. From start to finish, basically he tore up the piano. I have never heard anyone bang louder in the middle registers. In comparison, the bass was less clear and the treble somewhat monochromatic and percussive, though this is par for the course for Prokofiev. In comparison, Wang Yuja in 2010 (here) and 2012 (here) got more nuance out of this concerto. The orchestra under the Russian born Ashkenazy naturally got the full measure of this concerto, playing with power, precision, even some wit and sardonic edge when called for. In all, a fine effort. Although the piano had deteriorated sound by then, the Gluck-Sgambatti Melodie made a perfect encore.

Askenazy is a relatively late comer to Elgar, but his understanding is formidable. He has recorded much of Elgar for Exton and other labels, to almost universal acclaim. As he has delivered outstanding performances of the composer's In the South and Cello Concerto in HK in 2014 (here),  I was really looking forward to his Elgar 1st Symphony, and I was not disappointed.

The only reservation I had was the mammoth first movement, which Ashkenazy did not manage to completely hold together. The tempo was somewhat slow and from the middle on sometimes the quieter passages seemed rather episodic, not helped by HKPO's somewhat mechanical sounding strings. However, from the second movement on, the symphony went from strength to strength, with a positively thrilling finale. Ashkenazy's taut conducting and perfect balance had one's attention riveted. The brass played valiantly, even more heroic than in Bruckner. The winds' comparative weakness showed, but mattered little in this symphony.

I stood up and yelled "bravo" twice; had not felt like that in quite a while!

Concert Review: HKPO - Jaap - Karen Gomyo

Concert Review: HKPO - Jaap - Karen Gomyo

June 18, 2016, CCCH
HKPO - Jaap van Zweden - Karen Gomyo
Rossini - Bruch - Borstlap - Respighi

A spirited reading of Rossini's La Gazza Ladra Overture opened the program. The main attraction, Bruch's Violin Concerto No. 1 received a tidy performance from the team. Karen Gomyo has a nice tone and played smoothly, but the feeling was somewhat small-scaled. Jaap delivered an excellent accompaniment (as he always does), but wanting was the piece's sense of brooding and melancholia.

Second-half opened with a surprisingly tonal (in the twentieth century sense) newly commissioned work by Borstlap, Solemn Night Music. The program extravagantly introduces the composer as "...one of the first composers in Europe to explore the possibilities of a revival of the classical tradition...", and the music "...which absorbs the musical style of the 20th century, presents related ideas which are constantly varied and almost never repeated literally, so that we hear the same things in ever newer forms...". Unfortunately, while we hear snippets here and there reminiscent of Schoenberg's Verklarte Nacht, these were indeed "varied" to go nowhere. Borstlap's tepid "night music" is devoid of fantasy and not a patch on Schoenberg's masterpiece. One of the most boring piece of new music I have heard.

Respighi's Pines of Rome suits Jaap to a "T", who brought out every nuance in the luxurious score, and the orchestra was responsive to his every whim, though the piece remained music without much spiritual element. I wished the organ was louder.

Concert Review: HKPO Bruckner 4th

Concert Review: HKPO Bruckner 4th

June 11, 2016, CCCH
HKPO - Jaap van Zweden - Louis Lortie
Mozart - Bruckner

Concert opened with Mozart's Piano Concerto No. 22, which the sometimes wayward Lortie (in recordings) played surprisingly in a straight and fluid fashion. Although stylish, the last ounce of tonal and rhythmic refinement was missing, and his tone was not the biggest. The orchestral accompaniment was stylish and tight - commendable.

Bruckner's Fourth Symphony (Haas) received an excellent performance. All sections played at an elevated standard. Even more than the strings, the woodwinds seemed more fortified than usual. The brass was largely excellent, with steady and atmospheric horns. More importantly, Jaap van Zweden, an acknowledged Bruckner conductor, mostly had the right feeling of ebb and flow so important to Bruckner. He was also able to coax a full and truly thrilling sound in the climaxes, yet keep things tight and eventful in the equally important softer moments.

However, his approach did not fully carry the last movement. Maybe this sounds like heresy: like the Brahms Fourth, personally I have always found the ending problematic (the alternate editions too), as the ending "blaze" is to me not as thrilling as the first climaxes. Also, there are many start and stop passages, which under Jaap's literal rendition had a feeling remarkably close to the first movement of the Fifth Symphony (this is not as it should be, as the 5th inhabits a completely different world, with a less radiant, more mysterious atmosphere). Thus, in the last movement grandeur was only intermittently evident; my own feeling is you need some more shaping and stretching to achieve true atmosphere, and HKPO had achieved this before in this symphony (under Yuri Simonov and Gunther Herbig; see my write-up here). Lu Jia had also achieved more atmosphere in this symphony with his Macau Orchestra (here).

The HKPO strings are part of the problem. They played with accuracy and power, but not much radiance so important in Bruckner (which Lu Jia/Macau did well). Places like the repetitive figures in the last movement, and the Trio, just felt mechanical and earthbound. But overall, I am satisfied.

vs Philadelphia Orchestra/Yannick Nezet-Sequin's Bruckner 4th
Take all this with a grain of salt, as I did not attend the performance, having only heard it through the radio. It is pathetic that these are the only two performances of Bruckner in HK this year, that it had to be the same symphony and that they came within a month of each other!

I thought the Philadelphia rendition clearly rendered and very well played (as usual for this orchestra), but it had almost the same problem as the same team's Bruckner 9th I heard in Carnegie Hall (here), namely a lack of spiritual dimension in the last movement (Jaap did not escape from this either). In terms of flow, overall I prefer Jaap's conception.

Opinions among my friends were quite divided. Some reveled in the Piladelphia's sonority, while others found a curious lack of spiritual journey. At the HKPO concert, I ran into a dozen acquaintances - they were divided too but surprisingly the majority preferred the HKPO/Jaap performance. There is some brand loyalty and US-bashing here I think, but that is par for the course.

A thought: In the quest for precision, many performances under younger conductors to a variable degree miss the spiritual side of things. This is across the board, a world-wide phenomenon.

Concert Review: Richard Galliano

Concert Review: Richard Galliano

June 10, 2016, CH
Richard Galliano - City Chamber Orchestra - Jean Thorel
Vivaldi - Villa-Lobos - Piazolla - Galliano

I came to know polyglot musician Richard Galliano through his magnificent Bach album, which I first borrowed from the library. I liked it so much that I bought the CD.

The first half comprised an arrangement of Vivaldi's Four Seasons, for bandoneon, two violins, viola, cello and bass (same as in the Bach album). Although Bach himself had arranged much of Vivaldi successfully, Galliano's working of Vivaldi, unlike his Bach, was only intermittently successful. The bandoneon frequently gets tripped in both fast and slow passages. The string players of the CCOHK are marvelous. In particular, the playing of Concertmaster Amelia Chan was magnificent, completely fluid, and she frequently stole the limelight from Galliano!

Second-half opened without soloist, in a tidy rendition of Villa Lobos Bachianas Brasilerias No. 9, but I personally would like a larger orchestra (or a smaller space) for this composer's mostly sec works.

Piazolla's Aconcagua Concerto found Galliano in his true elements. Simply magnificent, and imho as good as the master's own! If only the strait-laced percussion (drum and tympani) had more Latin flavor!

Then came Galliano's La Valse a Margaux, a beautiful old-styled waltz played to perfection.

The encores were magnificent. The first was a potpurri - I think Galliano's own, maybe partly improvised. I heard everything, a trace of Bach here, maybe Widor too? And then Piazolla and so forth. Great stuff! Then came Piazolla's smoky Oblivion (with orchestral accompaniment) that rounded out a very nice evening.

Concert Review: HKPO - Atherton - Koranyi

Concert Review: HKPO - Atherton - Koranyi

May 28, 2016, CCCH
HKPO -Atherton - Jakob Koranyi
All Russian program

The HKPO was in fine form. David Atherton conducted in his familiar style: literal, driven and not much subtlety, but the familiar music carried the day. Borodin's Polovtsian Dances was a tidy opener.

Swedish cellist Jakob Koranyi substituted for Jing Zhao at short notice. He had a good tone but the sound was just too small for Shostakovich's Cello Concerto No. 1, getting covered by the orchestra. One has to fill in the blanks. Principal horn Lin Jiang was flawless.

The orchestra clearly loved Rimsky Korsakov's Sheherazade and the many soloists gave their best. Concertmaster Wang Jing as usual played with commitment, although the portrait was definitely on the yang side. One wished for a little more tenderness in many episodes (only in the andantino did Atherton cared to show a little) and a little more characterization in transitions would not be remiss (though one would not expect this of this conductor).

Overall, a satisfying concert.

Patti Smith M Train

pic from NYT.

Talk Book: Patti Smith M Train

"...without a doubt we sometimes eclipse our own dreams with reality..."

After reading Just Kids, I lost no time in reserving Patti Smith's newest book, M Train, from the HK Public Library. A month and a half later I got it, and since I I knew I cannot renew (others are in the line) I devoured it in just a few days, perhaps not the best way to read this mysterious beast of a creation, but likely just as well as I'd never fully comprehend her dreamscapes and lofty travails anyway.

For her journeys to obscure places, often to honor heroes of the past (concisely summarized by the NY Times review) are awesome; we mere mortals would never entertain such ideas. However, comprehension or not, one has to admire her determined nature.


As words and scenes leap out from every sentence, her colossal spiritual dimension is revealed. In an age when most people spend more time on researching what to do, wear or eat than actually doing things, I can only applaud someone who wouldn't care about fashion, fine dining and most luxuries (surely Patti Smith couldn't care less about hifi, even if she's a musician). In an age when people spend more time rating things, choosing emoticons and giving thumb-ups, in general living the life of others rather than discovering themselves, Patti Smith examines every recess of her psyche, excavates every buried emotion, and crafts a lifetime of words to describe her dreams, premonitions, pain. Indeed pain and loss, her own as well as reflections through others, permeate the book.

Patti Smith knows herself as well as any writer I have read, and the above quote perfectly describes this book.

Concert Review: Sinfonietta-Frang-Halls

Concert Review: Sinfonietta-Frang-Halls

May 14, CH
HK Sinfonietta - Vilde Frang - Matthew Halls
Haydn and Britten

Each half opened with Haydn and ended with Britten. Matthew Halls is an early music specialist but it was Britten who fared the better.

Haydn's Overture L'Isola Disabitata was tidy. But the Symphony No. 96, "Miracle", was too cautious. Perhaps the Sinfonietta was not quite attuned to quasi-period style playing. In any case, the inner movements (the wind playing was good) fared better than the outer ones, which came across as a little square. I also think the Sinfonietta is in my experience (more often than not) not so effective in reduced configuration.

Britten's Violin Concerto received a faultless rendition by Vilde Frang. She has a natural, breathing style and sweet tone across the spectrum. A minor quibble is that her sound is slightly on the small side, given that I was seated only in the middle of the hall (I also heard her in Carnegie Hall, which was too big for her I thought). The orchestral part was tidy and well controlled though the ultimate chemistry between soloist and orchestra was missing. Most unexpected was an absolutely superbly characterized Four Sea Interludes - each tableau was wonderfully detailed and harmonically full, the entire effect thrilling. Even played by famous orchestras, this piece can often be a bore in concert, but this account is a happy exception.

Haitink Mahler 9 Alsop Mahler 5

pic of Haitink from NYT

Concert Review: Mahler 9 and 5

April 14, David Geffen Hall
Bernard Haitink - New York Philharmonic
Mahler 9

A frail Haitink returned to conduct the NYPO in Mahler 9. This last completed Mahler symphony has always been one of his calling cards. I love his first recording, which received universal praise, and still have vivid memory of his unsurpassed 9th with the Berlin Philharmonic at Carnegie a good three decades ago.

As with his performance with the same forces of Mahler 3 two years ago, Haitink directed the orchestra with minimal motions and absolutely no fuss, yet a sparingly used and modest tightening and shaking of the fist could elicit a thunderous response from the orchestra in true climaxes. Haitink mostly just let the orchestra play, and they did so with great character. Haitink rarely highlights, yet I have never heard more details in the score.

Although sometimes one may have wished for a little more sardonic edge, the music could not have unfolded more organically. An important element in this type of artless approach is the contribution of the players. The brass and winds were particularly irreproachable, characterful in solo's and lucid even in the densest passages.

Haitink has aged even more since two years ago. Even the little steps up and down the podium proved laborious. I hope I shall get to hear him again.

April 16, Carnegie Hall
Marin Alsop - Baltimore Symphony Orchestra
Puts The City - Mahler 5

A new work by prize-winning composer Kevin Puts opened the program. The City was commissioned to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Baltimore SO and 125th year of the Carnegie Hall. Alsop made a little speech. The work was three years in the making and the programmatic work unexpectedly "had to consider" the recent riots and aftermath of the Freddie Gray shooting. The music was predictable enough in a post-minimalist way. It was accompanied by a film by Robert Bartolomeo, an unending succession of shots of Baltimore Streets and old photos. I found all of this pedestrian, even tacky. To me, the work was an uninspiring transposition of Philip Glass' Koyaanisqatsi, not one of his best works and accompanied at its premiere by a boring film too.

In comparison to the NYPO of two days ago, the limitation of the Baltimore Symphony showed rather embarrassingly. Marin Alsop's all-baton manner, though fluid and non-histrionic, also contrasted with Haitink's economy. In Mahler 5, the orchestra had a good, integrated sound, but there were obvious weaknesses. The winds in particular did not project well the Mahlerian swagger. Lower strings were also a little too light to provide a foundation. The upper strings played very precisely and were well molded by Alsop, but they too lacked power in key moments. Overall, there was a lack of transparency in the playing. Alsop's interpretation was fine and straightforward, but the execution, though tidy, was not of the highest caliber.

NYT review

Brahms Piano Quartets Andsnes Ehnes Zimmermann Hagen

pic from NYT.

Concert Review: Leif Ove Andsnes and Friends - Brahms Piano Quartets

April 9, 2016, Carnegie Hall
Leif Ove Andsnes - James Ehnes - Tabea Zimmermann - Clemens Hagen
Brahms The Three Piano Quartets

It is not so often one encounters one of Brahms' Piano Quartets in a program (usually performed by a string quartet with a guest pianist in the second half). To hear all three in one sitting is virtually unheard of, till now.

The players here are taking this program on tour. The original violinist was Christian Tetzlaff, who had to cancel the North American leg since his baby is due any day. They are lucky to have as replacement James Ehnes, equally internationally renowned violinist. Their first stop was 2 nights ago, at North Carolina (excellent local review here). So the players has had some time together before this concert.

ALL of the players are very experienced chamber music players. Leif Ove Andsnes have previously played with all the other musicians of the night, and on recordings serve as pianist to many a string quartet. James Ehnes has his own self-named String Quartet; Tabea Zimmermann is a founding member of the (excellent) Arcanto Quartet; Clemens Hagen is cellist of the Hagen Quartet. Their collective experience shone brightly in this program. Quartet No. 1 occupied the first half; the second half was lengthy as it had to accommodate the remaining two quartets, a total of about 90 minutes, taxing both the performers as well as the audience.

Heard in succession, even if separated by an intermission, the first two quartets, written in the same year, certainly sounded stylistically similar. Both received impeccable readings, but initially the first half, as the NC reviewer mentioned, sounded a bit tight. Sonically, the quartet opened up more in the second half - the piano sound was more lucid, and Ehnes' violin had more rosin. No. 3, written 20 years later, is a more enigmatic work; it was equally well played, its mercurial quality well caught, but the last once of pathos was not quite evident (for those who like it tat way).

There was not a whiff of indulgence. Andsnes' playing, as usual, was straightforward, but not strait-laced. Rhythms were finely sprung, and accents were strong when needed, providing a firm fulcrum for the strings to balance on. Yet, Andsnes could be poetic, colourful and atmospheric when needed. The intonation of the three string players were remarkable, never wavering. Ehnes' sound was very smooth and his phrasing always superbly musical; only occasionally a little more risk taking was desired. Hagen was superbly colourful and nuanced, better than I remember him with the Hagen Quartet. Most amazing of all was Zimmermann - no bones about it, the best violist I have ever heard. Most violist struggle to be heard; not Zimemrmann, who has a big tone, and here more often than not seemed to prompt, challenge and lead with a particularly strong phrase. Spellbinding! Most impressive was the unison - when the strings doubled, one could not tell them apart!

The reception was tremendous. At the intermission, I told the nice lady next to me that I could leave then - because it felt like a climax had been delivered, and I was thoroughly satisfied. Well, by the end of the concert, I felt like that three times! One of the best concerts that I have attended in the past decade.

p.s. after this article was published, the NYT review came in.